{"id":6180,"date":"2016-02-01T10:04:50","date_gmt":"2016-02-01T15:04:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/doyonavocats.ca\/contraignabilite-du-conjoint-de-fait-a-temoigner\/"},"modified":"2019-08-10T07:28:52","modified_gmt":"2019-08-10T11:28:52","slug":"contraignabilite-du-conjoint-de-fait-a-temoigner","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.doyonavocats.ca\/en\/contraignabilite-du-conjoint-de-fait-a-temoigner\/","title":{"rendered":"Contraignabilit\u00e9 du conjoint de fait \u00e0 t\u00e9moigner"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\">La Cour supr\u00eame refuse de se pencher sur la question de la contraignabilit\u00e9 du conjoint de fait \u00e0 t\u00e9moigner<\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">La contraignabilit\u00e9 du conjoint de fait a fait l&#8217;objet d&#8217;une d\u00e9cision r\u00e9cemment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"scc-csc.lexum.com\/scc-csc\/scc-l-csc-a\/fr\/item\/15709\/index.do?r=AAAAAQAGbmd1eWVuAQ\"><em>Bao Quoc Nguyen, et al. c. Sa Majest\u00e9 la Reine<\/em> (demande d&#8217;autorisation)<\/a> :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">La demande d\u2019autorisation d\u2019appel de l\u2019arr\u00eat de la Cour d\u2019appel de l\u2019Ontario, num\u00e9ros C51500, C52618 et C52619, 2015 ONCA 278, dat\u00e9 du 24\u00a0avril\u00a02015, est rejet\u00e9e sans ordonnance quant aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">La r\u00e8gle \u00e9nonc\u00e9e par la Cour d&#8217;appel de l&#8217;Ontario est la suivante.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;\"><em>R. c.\u00a0<\/em><a id=\"co_link_I66a456c0263011e586c7e6b9d23b3e4b\" class=\"co_link co_drag ui-draggable\" href=\"https:\/\/nextcanada.westlaw.com\/Link\/Document\/FullText?findType=Y&amp;serNum=2036144456&amp;pubNum=0007352&amp;originatingDoc=I10b717ea8e9c63f0e0440003ba0d6c6d&amp;refType=IC&amp;originationContext=document&amp;transitionType=DocumentItem&amp;contextData=(sc.RelatedInfo)\"><em>Nguyen<\/em>, 2015 ONCA 278<\/a>\u00a0\u2014 La r\u00e8gle de l&#8217;inhabilit\u00e9 du conjoint \u00e0 t\u00e9moigner ne devrait pas \u00eatre \u00e9largie aux conjoints de fait.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Voir contra, la d\u00e9cision de la Cour d&#8217;appel de l&#8217;Alberta.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; padding-left: 30px;\"><em>R. c.\u00a0<\/em><a id=\"co_link_I66986fe0263011e586c7e6b9d23b3e4b\" class=\"co_link co_drag ui-draggable\" href=\"https:\/\/nextcanada.westlaw.com\/Link\/Document\/FullText?findType=Y&amp;serNum=2033656438&amp;pubNum=0006455&amp;originatingDoc=I10b717ea8e9c63f0e0440003ba0d6c6d&amp;refType=IC&amp;originationContext=document&amp;transitionType=DocumentItem&amp;contextData=(sc.RelatedInfo)\"><em>Legge<\/em>, 2014 ABCA 213<\/a>\u00a0\u2014 La r\u00e8gle pr\u00e9voyant l&#8217;immunit\u00e9 des conjoints devrait \u00eatre appliqu\u00e9e de mani\u00e8re non discriminatoire. Les v\u00e9ritables conjoints de fait, ceux qui sont engag\u00e9s dans une relation exclusive \u00e0 long terme et qui ont consenti \u00e0 \u00eatre socialement et \u00e9conomiquement interd\u00e9pendants, devraient b\u00e9n\u00e9ficier de l&#8217;immunit\u00e9 des conjoints.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La Cour supr\u00eame refuse de se pencher sur la question de la contraignabilit\u00e9 du conjoint de fait \u00e0 t\u00e9moigner La contraignabilit\u00e9 du conjoint de fait a fait l&#8217;objet d&#8217;une d\u00e9cision r\u00e9cemment. Bao Quoc Nguyen, et al. c. Sa Majest\u00e9 la Reine (demande d&#8217;autorisation) : La demande d\u2019autorisation d\u2019appel de l\u2019arr\u00eat de la Cour d\u2019appel de [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":12705,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[120],"tags":[],"yst_prominent_words":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.doyonavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6180"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.doyonavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.doyonavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.doyonavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.doyonavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6180"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.doyonavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6180\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.doyonavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12705"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.doyonavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6180"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.doyonavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6180"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.doyonavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6180"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.doyonavocats.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=6180"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}